🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include events where African descendants are paid to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in winter, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the way the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to remove Black history and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be influential if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. An academic expert, a professor at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the past when it ignores the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that face all if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.